MEJOR TENSIOMETRO

Tensiómetros Homologados en España en 2024

Descubre una amplia selección de tensiómetros homologados en nuestra página. Encuentra modelos homologados para medir la presión en muñeca y brazo, de Omron, Beurer o Microlife. Estos aparatos digitales validados garantizan mediciones precisas de la presión arterial.

Explora nuestra lista de medidores de presión arterial homologados y elige entre las mejores opciones disponibles en Amazon.

Tensiómetros homologados Omron

Tensiómetros homologados Beurer

Tensiómetrop homologadop Hartmann

Tensiómetros homologados Microlife

Tensiómetros homologados Pic

Lista de Tensiómetros homologados por la Sociedad Europea de la Hipertensión (ESH) – Digitales y automáticos

MarcaModeloHomologación ESH 2002Homologación ESH 2010
A&DUM-201
A&DUM-211
BeurerBM45
BeurerBM85
HARTMANNTensoval Duo Control
HARTMANNTensoval Duo Control II
HARTMANNVeroval Duo Control
MicrolifeWatchBP Home A (BP3MX1-3)
MicrolifeWatchBP Home N (BP3MX1-4)
MicrolifeWatchBP Home S (BP3MX1-5)
MicrolifeWatchBP O3 (3MZ0)
MicrolifeWatchBP O3 (3MZ1)
MicrolifeWatchBP Office
MicrolifeWatchBP Office ABI
MicrolifeWatchBP Office AFIB
MicrolifeWatchBP Office Target
Omron705IT (HEM-759-E)
OmronHBP-1100
OmronHBP-1120
OmronHBP-1300
OmronHBP-1320
OmronHBP-T105
OmronHEM-7130 (Japanese model)
OmronHEM-7250-IT
OmronHEM-7251G
OmronHEM-7252G-HP
OmronHEM-7320F
OmronHEM-7500F
OmronEVOLV
(HEM-7600T-E)
Omroni-Q142
(HEM-1040-E)
OmronM2
(HEM-7121-E)
OmronM2 Basic
(HEM-7120-E)
OmronM3
(HEM-7131-E)
OmronM3
(HEM-7154-E)
OmronM3 Comfort
(HEM-7134-E)
OmronM3 Comfort
(HEM-7155-E)
OmronM3 IT
(HEM-7131U-E)
OmronM3W
(HEM-7202-E)
OmronM4-I
(HEM-752-E)
OmronM4 Intelli IT
(HEM-7155T-EBK)
OmronM6 AC
(HEM-7322-E)
OmronM6 Comfort
(HEM-7321-E)
OmronM6 Comfort
(HEM-7360-E)
OmronM6 Comfort IT
(HEM-7322U-E)
OmronM7 Intelli IT
(HEM-7322T-E)
OmronM7 Intelli IT
(HEM-7361T-EBK)
Omron(Colin) Pressmate BP10
OmronX3 Comfort
(HEM-7155-EO)
OmronX4 Smart
(HEM-7155T-ESL)
OmronX6 Comfort
(HEM-7360-EO)
OmronX7 Smart
(HEM-7361T-ESL)
PicSolution (Artsana)
PicIndolor (Artsana) CARDIOSimple
Ver Fuentes

1
Anwar YA, Tendler BE, McCabe EJ, Mansoor GA, White WB. Evaluation of the Datascope Accutorr Plus according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Blood Press Monit 1997;2(2):105-10
2
Bobrie G, Battaglia C. Assessment of Tensionic Mod EPS 112 semi-automatic device of blood pressure measurement (Manufactured by Spengler – France) J Hypertens 1999:17 (suppl 3):S22-S23. Abstract
3
Stergiou GS, Yiannes NG, Rarra VC. Validation of the Omron 705IT oscillometric device for home blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents: The Arsakion School Study Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006,11:229-234
4
Pujol E, Jimenez L, Estrada D, de la Sierra A. Accuracy of the automated oscillometric device Lohmeier B-606 for measurement of blood pressure in hospitals AJH 2002;15:74 A (Abstract)
5
Mattu GS, Perry TL, Wright JM. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100Beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer Blood Press Monit 2001;6:153-159
6
Wright JM, Mattu GS, Perry TL, Gelfer M, Strange KD, Zorn A, Chen Y. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor Blood Press Monit 2001;6:161-165
7
Jones CR, Taylor K, Poston L, Shennan AH. Validation of the Welch Allyn ‘Vital Signs’ oscillometric blood pressure monitor J Hum Hypertens 2001;15:191-195
8
Braam RL, de Maat CHA, Thien TH. Accuracy of the Welch Allyn Vital Signs Monitor 52000 Blood Pressure Measuring Device J Hypertens 2001;19 (suppl 2):S24 (Abstract)
9
Prisant LM, Resnick LM, Hollenberg SM. Assessment of sequential same arm agreement of blood pressure measurements by a CVProfilor DO-2020TM versus a Baumanometer� mercury sphygmomanometer Blood Press Monit 2001;6:149-152
10
El Assaad MA, Topouchian JA, Darne BM, Asmar RG. Validation of the Omron HEM-907 device for blood pressure measurement Blood Press Monit 2002;7:237-241
11
White WB, Anwar YA. Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults Blood Press Monit 2001;6:107-110
12
Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Comparison of the automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTru) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population Blood Press Monit 2004;9:39-45
13
Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM. Overall accuracy of the BpTru – an automated electronic blood pressure device Blood Press Monit 2004;9:47-52
14
Graves JW, Nash C, Baily KR, Sheps SG. Utility of an automated blood pressure (BP) measuring device (BPTru) in clinical decision making. American Journal of Hypertension 2003;16(No 5, Part 2):49A (Abstract P-29)
15
Tochikubo O, Nishijima K, Ohshige K, Kimura K. Accuracy and applicability of the Terumo ES-H55 double-cuff sphygmomanometer for hospital use Blood Press Monit 2003;8:203-209
16
Salvi P, Lio G, Ricci E, Labat C, Benetos A. Validation of a new hand-held transcutaneous arterial tonometer for a non-invasive evaluation of blood pressure values, pulse wave morphology and central hemodynamic parameters J Hypertens 2004;22 (suppl 1):S130 (Abstract P465)
17
White W, Herbst T, Thavarajah S, Giacco S. Clinical evaluation of the Trimline blood pressure cuffs with the Accutorr Plus Monitor Blood Press Monit 2003;8:137-140
18
Kobalava ZD , Kotovskaya YV , Rodionov EV, Moiseev VS. Validation of the TM-2564G device for in-hospital blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure Monitoring 2005;10:333-335
19
Coleman A, Freeman P, Steel S, Shennan A. Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006;11:27-32
20
El Assad M, Topouchian J, Asmar R. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT Blood Press Monit 2003;8(3):127-133
21
Reinders A, Reggiori F , Shennan AH. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population Blood Press Monit 2006;11:293-296
22
Wong SN, Sung RYT, Leung LCK. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006;11:281-291
23
Pergola PE, White CL, Graves JW, Coffey CS, Tonarelli SB, Hart RG, Benavente OR for the SPS3 investigators. Reliability and validity of blood pressure measurement in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:1-8
24
de Greeff A, Reggiori F, Shennan AH. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:51-55
25
Yarows SA. Accuracy of the HoMedics BPA-300, a home blood pressure monitor using the auscultatory method Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:339-343
26
Fonseca-Reyes S, Cervantes-Munguia R, de Alba-Garcia JG, Parra-Carrillo JZ, Lopez-Maldonado F, Montes-Casillas M. Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:321-327
27
Omboni S, Riva I, Giglio I, Caldara G, Groppelli A, Parati G. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:233-242
28
Alpert BS. Validation of the Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs blood pressure device according to the ANSI/AAMI SP10: 2002. Accuracy and cost-efficiency successfully combined Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:345-347
29
Topouchian J, El Feghali R, El Assaad H, Pannier B, Asmar R. Validation of the G-Care Electronics SP-8000 (op. cit. SP-800 ) Device for Blood Pressure Measurement According to the International Validation Protocol Journal of Hypertension 2006;25(suppl 2):S172 (Abstract)
30
de Greeff A, Arora J, Hervey S, Liu B, Shennan AH. Accuracy assessment of the Tensoval duo control according to the British and European Hypertension Societies’ standards Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:111-116
31
Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458
32
Fix ML, Goldstein JN, Listwa TM, Nelson SW, Thomas SH. Comparison of a radial artery compression device with invasive radial artery blood pressure monitoring Blood Press Monit 2008;13:199-203
33
Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit 2008;13:299-303
34
de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press Monit 2008;13:342-348
35
Friz HP, Facchetti R, Primitz L, Beltrame L, Galbiati V, Ricioppo A, Bombelli M, Sega R. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:222-227
36
Czarkowski M, Staszk�w M, Kostyra K, Shebani Z, Niemczyk S, Matuszkiewicz-Rowi?ska J. Determining the accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Omron HEM-907 before and after hemodialysis. Blood Press Monit 2009;14:232-238
37
Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616
38
Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Nasothimiou EG, Karpettas N, Protogerou A. Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24(3):207-12.
39
Ragazzo F, Saladini F, Palatini P. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 device for clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to the International Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2010;15(1):59-62.
40
Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self-measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(4):208-210.
41
Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinic use and self-measurement in a general population according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol, revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(5):262-264
42
Saladini F, Benetti E, Masiero S, Palatini P. Accuracy of Microlife WatchBP Office ABI monitor assessed according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension protocol and the British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2011;16(5):258-261
43
Chung Y, Brochut MC, de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Clinical accuracy of inflationary oscillometry in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: Omron-MIT Elite. Preg Hyper: An Int J Women’s Card Health 2012 (In press)
44
Chen C, Shang F, Wang J, Chen J, Ji N, Wan Y. Validation of the iHealth BP3 upper-arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2012;17(6):253-256.
45
Masiero S, Saladini F, Benetti E, Palatini P. Accuracy of the Microlife large-extra large-sized cuff (32-52 cm) coupled to an automatic oscillometric device. Blood Press Monit. 2011;16(2):99-102.
46
Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in auscultation mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p.
47
Masiero S, Fania C, Palatini P. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Apr 27. 4 p.
48
de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1011 upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Sep 01. 9 p.
49
de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Nissei DSK-1031 upper arm oscillometric blood pressure monitor intended for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2011 Oct 28. 3 p.
50
Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron M3W upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Mar 01. 4 p.
51
Takahashi H. Validation of the Omron i-Q142(HEM-1040-E), an upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Jun 07. 4 p.
52
Ding D. Validation of the FORA P30 Plus Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor, for Clinic Use and Self/Home Measurement, According to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2012 Oct 19. 6 p.
53
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7251G upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Feb 01. 4 p.
54
Palatini P. Validation of the Thermor Bios BP215 upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Oct 09. 11 p.
55
de Greeff A, Shennan AH. Validation of the Tensoval Duo Control II blood pressure monitor for clinic use and self-measurement according to the British Hypertension Society protocol and the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(3):161-6.
56
Zeng WF, Liu M, Kang YY, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the fully automated A&D TM-2656 blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):223-6.
57
Gothardo AC, Savioli AF, Santos DS, Lamas JL. Lack of validation of the Dixtal (DX 2020) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinical use in an intensive care unit, according to the European Society of Hypertension-International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit 2013;18(4):215-8.
58
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7130 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p.
59
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7320F upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p.
60
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HEM-7500F upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2013 Nov 14. 4 p.
61
Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Charilaos P. Gkinos CP, Patouras JD. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol Blood Press Monit 2007;12:185-188
62
Chung Y, de Greeff A, Shennan A. Validation and Compliance of a Home Monitoring Device in Pregnancy: Microlife WatchBP Home. Hypertens Pregnancy 2009;28(3):348-59.
63
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 Comfort (HEM-7321-E) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p.
64
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON M6 AC (HEM-7322-E) upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 Jan 22. 4 p.
65
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the OMRON HBP-1300 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2014 May 22. 4 p.
66
Guo WG1, Li BL, He Y, Xue YS, Wang HY, Zheng QS, Xiang DC. Validation of the Andon KD-5917 automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. Blood Press Monit 2014;19(4):242-5.
67
Takahashi H, Yokoi T, Yoshika M. Validation of the Omron HEM-7252G-HP upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use and self measurement in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 [Internet]. Dublin: dablEducational Trust; 2015 Jan 16. 4 p.
68
Hannah L. Nathan, Annemarie de Greeff, Natasha L. Hezelgrave, Lucy C. Chappell and Andrew H. Shennan. Validation of the Microlife 3AS1-2 semi-automated blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society. Blood Pressure Monitoring 2015;20:52-55
69
Bilo G., Zorzi C., Ochoa Munera J.E., Torasco C., Giuli V. and Parati G. Validation of the Somnotouch-NIBP non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Pressure Monitoring 2015 Oct; 20(5):291-94
70
Kobalava ZD, Kotovskaya YV, Babaeva LA, Moiseev VS. Validation of the TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement Blood Press Monit 2006;11:87-90
71
Beimea B., Deutscha C., Kr�gera R., Zimmermannb E. and Bramlagea P. Validation of the blood pressure measurement device Erkameter 125 PRO according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2016 Dec;21(6):356-360.
72
Wua N, Zhangb X, Wangb W and Zhangb H. Validation of the Andon KD5031 for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2016 Oct; 21(5):310-312(3).
73
Wua N, Zhangb X, Wangb W and Zhangb H. Validation of the Andon KD595 for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2016 Apr;21(2):124-7.
74
TOPOUCHIAN J., ZELVEIAN P. and ASMAR R. Validation of the automatic blood pressure measurements device, the OMRON EVOLV (HEM- 7600 T-E)® in Pregnancy according to the Modified European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP). [Internet]. Dublin: dabl Educational Trust; 2018 Jan 08.
75
TOPOUCHIAN J., ZELVEIAN P. and ASMAR R. Validation of the automatic blood pressure measurements device, the OMRON M3 COMFORT (HEM -7134-E)® in Pregnancy according to the Modified European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP). [Internet]. Dublin: dabl Educational Trust; 2018 Jan 08.
76
Chen Q., Lei L., Li Y. and Wang JG. Validation of the YuWell YE690A upper-arm blood pressure monitor, for clinic use and self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2017 Oct;22(5):295-297.
77
Kollias A., Stambolliu E., Kyriakoulis KG., Papadatos SS., Stergiou GS. Validation of the single-cuff oscillometric blood pressure monitor InBody BPBIO320 for public use according to the 2010 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. 2018 Dec 7;
78
Takahashil H., Nishiyauchi K.,Yoshikawa N. and Hishiki Y. A clinical evaluation report of the performance of the OMRON digital blood pressure monitor, HBP-1320, on accuracy as compared to the value measured by auscultation with a mercury sphygmomanometer.
79
Takahashi H. Validation of the OMRON HBP-1320 upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometry mode, for clinic use in a general population, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.
80
Fania C., Albertini F. and Palatini P. Validation of the A&D UM-201 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2017 Aug;22(4):234-237.
81
Fania C., Albertini F. and Palatini P. Validation of the A&D UM-211 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2017 Oct;22(5):302-305.
82
Zhang W, L L, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the HL868ED upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinical use and self-measurement according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2019 Aug;24(4):203-207.
83
Zhang W., Lei L., Li Y., Wang JG. Validation of the HL868ED upper-arm blood pressure monitor for clinical use and self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Press Monit. 2019 Oct 25.
84
Kollias, Anastasios; Gravvani, Areti; Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis; Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos G.; Bountzona, Ioanna; Menti, Ariadni; Stergiou, George S. Validation of the InBody BPBIO250 oscillometric blood pressure monitor for professional office use in general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard. Blood Pressure Monitoring: April 2020 – Volume 25 – Issue 2 – p 115-117.
85
Kollias, Anastasios; Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis; Gravvani, Areti; Stambolliu, Emelina; Bountzona, Ioanna; Menti, Ariadni; Stergiou, George S. Validation of the InBody BP170 oscillometric home blood pressure monitor in general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard Blood Pressure Monitoring: February 2020 – Volume 25 – Issue 1 – p 50-52.
86
Kanako Saito, Yukiko Hishiki, Hakuo Takahashi. Validation of the Omron HBP-9031C professional office blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol. Journal of human hypertension: 2020 Jan 22. Online ahead of print.
87
Validation of the Hingmed DBP-01P clinical automatic blood pressure monitor provided with wide-range cuff, evaluated in a general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 Protocol Claudio Fania, Antonella Giletto, Valentina Zanello and Paolo Palatini. Blood Pressure Monitoring 28(2):p 116-120, April 2023.
131
Validation of the JOYTECH DBP-6279B blood pressure monitor in adults and adolescents according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard(ISO 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020) Baojing Duana, Le Heb, Jianling Zhangc, Lixiu Fangd and Gang Lia. Blood Pressure Monitoring ():10.1097/MBP.0000000000000662, July 12, 2023.
132
Validation of the InBody BPBIO480KV validation according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard. Angeliki Ntineri, Aikaterini Theodosiadi, Ariadni Menti, Konstantinos G. Kyriakoulis, Vasileios Ntousopoulos, Anastasios Kollias, and George S. Stergiou Journal of Hypertension 41(2):p 356-361, February 2023.

Lista de Tensiómetros homologados por la Sociedad Europea de la Hipertensión (ESH) – Aneroides y manuales

MarcaModeloHomologación
ESH 2002
A&DUM-102
AccosonGreenlight 300
HeineGamma G7
HeineGamma XXL-LF
MicrolifeBP 3AS1-2
MicrolifeWatchBP Office
MicrolifeWatchBP Office AFIB
NisseiDM-3000
PicSolution (Artsana)
PicIndolor (Artsana) Professional Check
PlusmedpM-NT 01
RossmaxMandaus II
Ver Fuentes

1. Graves JW, Tibor M, Murtagh B, Klein L, Sheps SG. The Accoson Greenlight 300 – the first non-automated mercury-free blood pressure measurement device to pass the International Protocol for blood pressure measuring devices in adults Blood Press Monit 2004;9:13-17
2. Shabeeh H, Cuckson AC, Jones C, Randhawa M, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory blood pressure measuring device: the PMS Mandaus.[dabl® Educational Trust regrets that full details are missing]S.233 (Abstract)
3. O’Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O’Malley K. Inaccuracy of seven popular sphygmomanometers for home-measurement of blood pressure. J Hypertens 1990;8:621-634.
4. Reinders A, Jones C, Cuckson A, Shennan A, The Maxi Stabil 3: Validation of an aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2003;8:83-89
5. Wilton A, Shabeeh H, Cuckson C, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device with manual pressure registration (PMS Mandaus) Blood Press Monit 2006;11:161-164
6. Dorigatti F, Bonso E, Zanier A, Palatini P. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure Monitoring 2007;12:29-33
7. Stergiou GS, Giovas PP, Gkinos CP, Tzamouranis DG. Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol Blood Pressure Monitoring 2008;13:37-42
8. Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Protogerou A, Nasothimiou E, Kapralos C. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol Blood Press Monit 2008;13:299-303
9. Tasker F, de Greeff A, Liu B, Shennan AH. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II Blood Press Monit 2009;14:121-124
10. de Greeff A, Nathan H, Stafford N, Liu B, Shennan AH. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings. Blood Press Monit 2008;13:342-348
11. Asmar R, Khabouth J, Mattar J, Pecchioli V, Germano G. Validation of three professional devices measuring office blood pressure according to three different methods: the Omron BP10, the Omron HBP T105 and the Pic Indolor Professional. J Hypertens 2010;28(3):452-458
12. Tasker F, De Greeff A, Shennan AH. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000. J Hum Hypertens 2010;24:609-616


Preguntas Frecuentes sobre tensiómetros homologados

¿La Sociedad Española de Hipertensión homologa oficialmente aparatos de tensión arterial?

Actualmente, la Sociedad Española de Hipertensión no cuenta con un programa oficial de homologación de tensiómetros. La institución encargada de estas homologaciones y validaciones en Europa es la Sociedad Europea de la Hipertensión (ESH).

¿Qué es un tensiómetro homologado y por qué es importante?

Un tensiómetro homologado es un dispositivo de medición de la presión arterial que ha sido sometido a pruebas y evaluaciones por organismos autorizados con el propósito de garantizar su precisión y calidad, por lo tanto la homologación asegura que el dispositivo cumpla con estándares y requisitos específicos antes de salir al mercado.

¿Cómo puedo saber si un tensiómetro está homologado?

Puedes verificar si un tensiómetro está homologado buscando sellos o certificaciones en el propio producto o en el sitio web de compra. Estos sellos son otorgados por entidades regulatorias que evalúan y certifican la precisión y confiabilidad del dispositivo.

¿Cuáles son las características clave de un tensiómetro homologado?

Las características clave de un tensiómetro homologado incluyen su precisión en la medición de la presión arterial, su confiabilidad a lo largo del tiempo y su cumplimiento con estándares médicos y regulaciones específicas. Estas características son esenciales para garantizar resultados confiables y precisos.

¿Dónde puedo comprar un tensiómetro homologado de buena calidad?

Puedes adquirir tensiómetros homologados en tiendas en Amazon, farmacias o establecimientos de suministros médicos. Es importante elegir fuentes confiables para asegurarte de obtener un producto auténtico y homologado.

¿Existen requisitos específicos para que un tensiómetro esté homologado?

Sí, existen requisitos y regulaciones específicas para la homologación de tensiómetros. Estos requisitos garantizan que los dispositivos cumplan con estándares médicos y de precisión antes de ser comercializados, y son los siguientes: Precisión, Calidad de Fabricación, Cumplimiento de Normas, Etiquetado y Marcado, Documentación Técnica, Pruebas Clínicas, Seguridad, Marcado CE u Otras Certificaciones, Cumplimiento con Requisitos Médicos y Cumplimiento de Directrices Regulatorias.

¿Qué diferencias hay entre un tensiómetro homologado y uno que no lo está?

Los tensiómetros homologados tienden a ser más precisos y confiables que aquellos que no están homologados, ya que deben cumplir con rigurosos estándares de precisión establecidos por las autoridades de regulación.

¿Qué organizaciones o instituciones se encargan de homologar los tensiómetros?

La homologación de los tensiómetros es realizada por diversas instituciones y autoridades médicas que evalúan la precisión y calidad del dispositivo. Algunos ejemplos son la FDA (Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos) en Estados Unidos y la CE (Conformidad Europea) en la Unión Europea.

¿Los tensiómetros homologados son más precisos que otros?

Los tensiómetros homologados suelen ser más precisos debido a las pruebas y evaluaciones que deben superar para obtener la homologación. Esto asegura que el dispositivo brinde mediciones consistentes y confiables.

¿Cuál es el proceso de homologación de un tensiómetro?

El proceso de homologación de un tensiómetro implica pruebas exhaustivas en entornos controlados para evaluar su precisión y rendimiento en diversas situaciones. Este proceso puede llevar tiempo, ya que se busca garantizar la calidad y confiabilidad del dispositivo.

¿Los tensiómetros homologados son adecuados para uso doméstico o médico?

Los tensiómetros homologados son adecuados tanto para uso doméstico como médico, ya que cumplen con estándares de precisión requeridos en ambos contextos. Sin embargo, los profesionales médicos suelen requerir dispositivos homologados debido a su alta precisión.

¿Existen marcas específicas conocidas por fabricar tensiómetros homologados?

Algunas marcas conocidas que fabrican tensiómetros homologados incluyen Omron, Beurer y A&D. Por lo tanto estas marcas suelen tener una reputación establecida en cuanto a la calidad y precisión de sus dispositivos.

¿Los tensiómetros homologados son obligatorios para uso médico?

En entornos médicos, el uso de tensiómetros homologados es fundamental para garantizar mediciones precisas y confiables, lo que puede influir en decisiones clínicas y tratamientos.

¿Hay diferencias de precio significativas entre los tensiómetros homologados y los que no lo están?

Los tensiómetros homologados tienden a tener un precio más elevado en comparación con los que no están homologados debido a los costos asociados con el proceso de evaluación y certificación.

¿Cómo puedo asegurarme de que el tensiómetro homologado que elija sea confiable y preciso?

Para asegurarte de elegir un tensiómetro homologado confiable, investiga marcas reconocidas, busca certificaciones de homologación en el producto y considera consultar con profesionales de la salud para obtener recomendaciones.

Marcas de Tensiómetros Homologados